The Art of Aligning Social Media Strategy With Communications Strategy

Remixing Social Media Strategy Game

View more presentations from kanter.

Over the summer,  Holly Minch, who is an expert at helping nonprofits and philanthropies unlock the potential of strategic communications for social change, suggested that I facilitate a workshop on social media strategy with a group of nonprofit and philanthropy communications folks.  

I'm so glad she did because for a while I've been wanting to better understand how a social media strategy can best align with overall communications strategies and where the nuances of implementation may different.  How does designing (and implementing) a social media strategy easily support and enhance the overall communications mix?  And where are the tensions?   How to resolve those?   

Last week, Holly's suggestion turned into a reality.  I had the honor of working with a group of really smart communications practitioners who have decades of experience working with nonprofits and/or foundations.   I learned a lot in terms of the content but also as a facilitator.

Aligning Social Media Strategy With Communications Strategy

I've facilitated many versions of the social media strategy game that I first co-taught with David Wilcox in the UK in January, 2007 and decided to create a new version for this group to get specific feedback on how to align the social strategy thinking process with the communications thinking process. 

Some overall observations and insights from the participants:

• Focus on audience, messaging, and theory of change.   The strategy discussions during the small group sessions were rich and focused on objectives.   There was, however, the tension between the tactical versus keeping it at higher level.  What's clear is the need for a very clear theory of change.

• Planning Time Frames Differ:  I kept reminding people that the strategy they came up didn't have to be finished or perfect.  That the learning was in the discussion, not necessarily the finished product.  This group shared that they usually have many meetings to focus on the message, objective, audience, and research.   I wondered about the Clay Shirky quote, "We spend more time trying to make something perfect, than we do if we just tried it and fixed it."  Social media requires a little bit of micro planning - those small tests and this could be a tension point for social media strategy mixing with communications.

• Listening is more than free market research:   With traditional communications planning, research is very important and there is a lot done on the front end.   With social media, listening needs to incorporated into the research phase at the beginning but must also be used as the social media strategy unfolds (real time monitoring) and as ongoing evaluation.

• Fluidity of the social media implementation process is a benefit:   The overall communications planning approach requires a lot of structure and discipline.  As one participant said, "You have your communications plan but it sometimes can prevent you from jumping on opportunities.  On the other hand, you need to have some framework to be able to jump on opportunities.  This causes a lot of anxiety.  But your social media strategy has this flexibility to react to issues and be adaptive."

• Experimentation and Metrics:   Experimenting and tweaking and refining social media must be pegged to particular metrics and it is helpful to have some method for experimentation to reap all the learning.  The important question is to ask, "to what end?

• Tool mastery may belong to younger people, but ..  Experience and seasoned communications people can provide guidance on strategy, time management, and other values.  

• Importance of Fast Failure:  That's a difficult one to negotiate because staff members (or consultants) don't get paid to fail.   It is important to define expectations, put mitigation plans into place, and embrace failures that will no doubt happen.

Some reflections I had on the materials:

• Situation:  This is the description of the organization or network the same group is developing a strategy for.   I've experimented with having very realistic and detailed scenarios, just a few sentences (the group makes up the rest), fictional scenarios that were fun, and not so detailed realistic scenarios.   I think key is to keep it simple, if a group gets stuck because some detail is missing, encourage them to make it up.

• Point System:   I need to rethink the point system based on the changes I've made the social media framework, especially some of the assumptions about social content. I need to revise the scoring system so it encourages the best social media strategic thinking.

• Cards:   Some really good suggestions about having a sub header on the cards that describes an outcome.   Also, include tip sheet that provides these tool is good for xyz, but not good for abc.  Right now the cards have questions and this group was asking for experiential advice on the cards.   I'm thinking a handout might work best because those evolving best practices tend to change quickly.

• Purpose Check:  The last part of the exercise should circle back to the objective and discussion that asks does the strategy we created help us reach our strategic goal or not?   List three reasons why this tool or tactic helps us reach our goal.  There was a request for another set of cards that might have some metrics.

• Next Modules:  This would include going in more depth on how to use the tools.  I see this as the perfect design, similar to the WeAreMedia workshops.   For example, deeper dives on the mechanics of listening, engaging, social networks, or social content.

Communications Network Social Media Game presentation

View more presentations from newstips.

Next week at the Communications Network Conference,  my colleague Gordon Meyer from Community Media Workshop in Chicago is doing a 90 minute version of the "Social Media Strategy Game."    I'll be curious to find out what they discover as I'll be doing a two-hour version of the game the week after next at PopTech.

Comments

[Eric Schwartzman]

Hi Beth,

I was just turned onto your social media strategy game by a client who wants to play it at their annual retreat. After checking it out, I thought it was a great idea and am looking forward to it. As per CC 3.0, I'll make sure you get full attribution.

Meanwhile, I'd like to feature you as a guest on www.ontherecordpodcast.com. I've been producing it since April 2005 and based on my previous guests (Steve Rubel, Katie Paine, David Sifry, Walt Mossberg, David Pogue and others), you'll be in excellent company. I'm currently averaging around 18,000 downloads per month.

Also, I am co-chair (with Elizabeth Albrycht) of a conference organized by PRSA called the Digital Impact in NYC next May and am going to recommend you as a speaker. Are you available May 6-7, 2009?

Best,

Eric

[Marketing Dissertation]

Blogs are so informative where we get lots of information on any topic. Nice job keep it up!!

[gordon]

Hi! Thanks for posting the CMW version of your game and for using creative commons to make it shareable--to me this is another example of how good ideas spread through the nonprofit-sphere when costs are kept low... like cardstock to print the game and intern time (on a good day) to cut them up :)

two additional quick reflections:

• Situation: I have found a really helpful way to play the game is with all the members of the same organization, where they are united in a single goal--then lots of different small groups are playing the game, and when they report out at the end it's interesting to see the overlapping tools that multiple groups have chosen--kind of a back door to wisdom of the group. For example, in Detroit last summer, a whole bunch of folks at the convention and visitors bureau included "other people's blogs" as an important tool, which I believe they've gone on to incorporate in their outreach.
• Points: I think the value of the point system is in the real-life limitation it presents to folks, and it makes the "game" more real. Virtually everyone has to function within some budgetary (or time) limits -- and actually having some limits (of course the game time is a limit, too) probably helps people to make decisions -- although perhaps it slows people from "outside-the-box" thinking? Maybe that's OK--the goal of the game is not really to think outside boxes, but to understand options and let people apply their well honed strategic minds (as you point out) to a relatively new set of choices--from among a series of social media tools. (I do think we should look at revising some of our tools--the other day someone suggested AdWords as a new tool, and Kara Carrell and I looked at each other like, "of course!")

[Beth]

Gordon: That's what I've been doing - giving everyone the same scenario. It's richer. Have been tweaking the level of detail in the scenario as well.

[Danielle Brigida]

Fantastic post Beth. As always :)