Photo by NimagesDR
No.
Can Twitter help your cause raise money?, a question asked by the Give and Take blog.
YES!
Avi Kaplan has published some basic stats from the recent Tweetsgiving Campaign that raised over $10,000 in 48 hours right before and during Thanksgiving to build a classroom in Tanzania. Some holy grail metrics are we need? Velocity and influence and it's darn hard to track those.
The Working Wikily blog describes this fundraiser as a "flash cause," I'm not sure, I think it is hybrid. I'd like to see an analysis of retweeting, number of new donors, an overlay of the blogging campaign with the hash tag trending, how much off twitter promotions generated direct traffic to donations page and vice a versa. This would have to be done with some social networking analysis software that maps twitter accounts to donors and displays results. Does it exist? (ahem, @pistachio?)
The closest thing I've seen is a little utility called Twitinfluence - it measures an individual users Twitter network based on the following: But not the network itself.
- First and Second Order Networks
- Reach
- Velocity
- Social Capital
- Centralization
- Efficiency
As Jeremiah Owyang points out that "Retweet" (sharing a link or
tweet from one of your followers with your followers) is a social
gesture indicating endorsement of an idea and predicts that there will be an analytics tools to measure this.
In the menatime, here's a few twitter stat tools from Brian Solis's awesome list
- Plodt plots your professional or personal life, interests, activities, and moods on Twitter. Basically you can categorize your Tweets so that you can analyze them as an individual as well as compared to the community at large.
- Twitt(url)y is a service for tracking popular URLs people are sharing on Twitter as a way to identify trends, topics, and new and interesting tools and services. It's basically Techmeme or Google News for Twitter, but for all popular links shared in a given day.
- Favrd (pronounced Favored) is a service that channels the most "favorited" tweets on Twitter. You can search by keyword and also see who else has favorited a particular tweet in order to identify like-minded contacts.
- TwitLinks aggregates the latest links from the worlds top tech twitter users.
- Twist analyzes and presents trend comparisons and volume between keywords and tags.
- Plodt plots your professional or personal life, interests, activities, and moods on Twitter. Basically you can categorize your Tweets so that you can analyze them as an individual as well as compared to the community at large.
The big point is that successful efforts just don't happen on Twitter - it takes social capital, strategy, and the right metrics to track and evaluate what worked and what didn't.
Hi Beth,
Thanks for the post. I'm anticipating trying a twitter campaign for ChristmasFuture to raise money for some of the development projects on our site (100% goes to those projects). I think we've a good strategy and some social capital.
Anyway, when we move forward with the campaign, likely in the next 10 days, I'll post more advanced metrics and share those on our blog. Perhaps we can start evaluating a few more trends for other NGO 2.0s to use.
Take care,
Leif
Posted by: Leif Baradoy | December 03, 2008 at 10:14 AM
Numbers alone really don't give us the full story -- you need to have mapped them to strategy - so if you are willing to be radically transparent in sharing your strategy in ahead of time that would be awesome .. plus how you will measure success - plus what you think worked or didn't .. B
Posted by: Beth | December 03, 2008 at 10:22 AM
Thanks for the rapid response.
ChristmasFuture fully embraces transparency--we're staking our organization on it and improving the everyday givers insight into what is going on in the developing world.
I wasn't simply taking about numbers and metrics--I want to share the comprehensive picture of the campaign. The issue is that we're a small start up in our busy season, so I'll have to balance the planning/strategy with other critical items. Of course, this is very common, so whatever we come up with should be applicable to many other organizations!
I'll do a pre-post on our strategy and send you a link by commenting here. Would that work?
Posted by: Leif Baradoy | December 03, 2008 at 10:38 AM
Just love the information you are providing here. I am just starting to get some of the smaller nonprofits in my area to look and think about the new avenues social media offers
Posted by: Susan | December 03, 2008 at 10:43 AM
Take it from me, you can do it on twitter and twitter alone. Of course, it would help to have a presence across several social networks but we're noticing the bulk of people actually walking the walk are the folks on twitter.
We're in the middle of a campaign right now, our 3rd in two years. So far, extrememly successful. We'll see how well we do when the project ends at the end of Dec.
Posted by: Trish | eMail Our Military | December 03, 2008 at 03:46 PM
Great points about the need for measuring velocity and influence, and that's quite a useful list of Twitter measurement tools. I was wondering: could you say more about what you feel would qualify TweetsGiving as a "flash cause"?
Posted by: Noah Flower | December 08, 2008 at 09:21 AM
Hi Beth,
Here's the link to some initial thoughts on the Twitter campaign that we're running.
http://www.christmasfuture.org/2008/12/11/tweetmasfuture_start/
I'd love for you to have a look and weigh in with some thoughts. We're particularily challenged on the measurement element of gifts, as we aren't using any third-party fundraising platforms and our current gift giving model doesn't track campaigns like this. I'm looking to solve this.
Anyway, I'd love your thoughts on the campaign.
Be well,
Leif
Posted by: Leif Baradoy | December 11, 2008 at 09:57 AM