Second Wave Adoption
The slide show comes from Nancy White (I've had slide share on my list .. and thanks for showing it off ..) "I have been thinking about six practices around tool adoption. They are sort of embedded in this slide show, but I don't think they are clear enough yet. So here goes -- just a bit of thinking."
That's the conclusion. She starts off with a post that summarizes what she and her colleagues have been writing about as it relates to "Second Wave Adoption" and online collaboration. This has been bubbling in the back of my mind, but looking at nonprofits and adoption of social media tools or what I started to call the participatory nonprofit.
The concept of Second Wave Adoption is, if I'm understanding it correctly, comes after the techies and other early adopters have created some innovated "proof of concept" projects. It is when the organization really embraces the technology and integrates it into its practice. And now this comes at time when things have shifted ...
Nancy points over to Bev Traynor's reflections on this and the questions she surfaces:
Are we focusing on the right value to the people we are asking to use these new tools and ways of working?
How do we stimulate people's imagination to try new things, like tools and processes that may be of use?
How do we trigger inventiveness with new tools?I definitely have some thoughts on this, but need some breathing space to surface them.
What Nancy's talking about is a shift in the use and tools. I can't put my finger on it, but some of it some relates to the MacArthur Foundation's birth of a new field ... but instead of learning for children, it's learning for adults.
Beth, this is an interesting and timely discussion. I just did a post on a nonprofit project called The Bridge which seems to me to represent and embrace many of the Web 2.0 strategies and approaches. They "get" how to leverage the new technology and I suspect it's because their organization (The Glue Network) was created during this era.
When it comes to creating a participatory nonprofit, I suspect that it will be easier to build one from the ground up, than it will be to integrate the tools into an existing culture. In part, this is because it's less about the tech and more about the mindset it takes to effectively utilize these tools.
Many organizations are built upon a command and control closed communication model. That culture is completely antithetical to the participatory nonprofit. Having a nonprofit that can effectively navigate this new world will require a degree of "letting go" and paying attention to process, not just outcomes. These are not the skill sets and mindset that have been developing in the past several years.
I also have begun to believe that part of the challenge is in making Web 2.0 very concrete and real. With years of training nonprofit staff under my belt, I've grown to understand that many of them are concrete thinkers who need to see in black and white (or on the computer screen) exactly what it would look like in their organization or an organization like their's.
So to me, the challenge is two-fold. First, there's a need to look at what it takes to build a participatory culture. The second is finding ways to get the message across to nonprofits simply, visually and without a lot of technical jargon.
Just some thoughts. . . now I'm off to read the rest of what you have here. I think this is a really important conversation.
Posted by: Michele Martin | November 08, 2006 at 06:51 AM
I'm following you and Michele around as you post/leave comments on this. Mmm, yummy conversation. More on my blog tonight. (Am at a meeting of school technology directors today and I sense I'll be thinking about this in a particular context today.
THANKS
Posted by: Nancy White | November 08, 2006 at 08:28 PM
Beth, I just incorporated a reference to this post in my blog. And it is my first experiment in creating a trackback.
You're connecting up social networking, collaboration, adult learning, and real value issues are at the heart of it all. And Steve Bridger made a comment elsewhere that 'nonprofits don't have time to dawdle.' Social entrepreneurs only have time to use social networking, collaboration, and learning tools that have a direct, practical result in the real world - making their earned income ventures more profitable.
Web 2.0 tools have the potential to make this happen. Your blog is a FOUNTAIN of WEALTH for nonprofit social entrepreneurs to recognize how these tools can be harnessed. Thank you.
Posted by: Sandra Dickinson | November 10, 2006 at 10:49 AM