My Photo

About Beth Kanter

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

License and Search

Where to Find Me on the Social Web

Beth's Blog: Flickr Photos


  • www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from cambodia4kidsorg. Make your own badge here.

Beth's Blog: Channels, Screencasts, and Videos

Categories

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Nonprofit Tech Blogs

Site Tracking




  • This is my Google PageRank™ - SmE Rank free service Powered by Scriptme


backchannel

The Art of the Backchannel at Conferences: Tips, Reflections, and Resources


Photo by Marcopolos

I'm a few weeks away from SXSW where I'll be leading a session called "Nonprofit Social Media ROI Poetry Slam" which will incorporate a lot of audience interaction.   I've been thinking about how to best incorporate the back channel or in this case Twitter.    Two recent blogs, "How To Present While People Are Twittering" and "Trends in Leadership Conferences" are the most recent blog posts packed with advice.

For those of us who have been attending blogging and tech conferences, the backchannel is not new. What's different is that the backchannel is being used in non-technology conferences. It is being used less for remote participation and more for people in the room.  The tool of choice has changed from IRC or Meebo to Twitter and the use of hashtags.  What's also different is that more and more people are viewing the back channel as integrated with the conference networking and participant learning.

Can the backchannel evolve past "snarkiness on parade" or "complaint festival" to improve learning and networking in conference sessions?  How can the backchannel enhance our attentiveness and learning?

In 2005, at the Les Blogs conference in Paris, there was a flap about the backchannel because the conversation crossed a line. 

Raymond M. Kristiansen captured the drama on this video clip of Mena Trott's Keynote calling for more civility in blog commenting.  At this conference in 2005, the backchannel was projected on the screen behind the speaker.  Mena  got angry at the comments because they were not so civil - particularly those from Ben MetCalfe who Mena called out publically.  (Warning she says the F-word on the clip.)  See Dave Winer's comments here, or as someone on the vlog list "Fighting for civilty using rudeness."

Raymond raised some good reflective questions about backchannels that are still very relevant four years later as back channels goe more mainstream and search for best practices on how to incorporate them into our conferencing experience.

  • How do they affect the relationship between those on the stage and the audience?
  • What does this intermediation of dialogues mean?
  • How can we use back-channels as a progressive force at conferences?
  • How can we use them as a test of how things are going at the conference?
  • How can we play further with the distance between those up there - on the podium and those in the audience?


I remember in 2005 the Global Voices Summit used IRC as a backchannel -- no so much for people in the room, but for remote participation.   They appointed a person in the room as the "Backchannel Advocate" and the speaker would ask them verbalize questions from the backchannel.  To make this model work, there was another IRC backchannel that streamed audio from the conference and someone did the equivalent of live tweeting.

One of the reflections to come out of 2008's SXSW Conference was for moderators of panels to use Twitter (or back channel tool) to poll the audience upfront and monitor it in real time.  Nancy White made an insightful observation, "The new tools give us new ways to transmit the cues and sense where others are, even if we do not coordinate our actions. It’s like a new set of antennae."  So, if you're moderating a panel, think of yourself as a giant insect!

As someone who has been a trainer for all these years, one of the things we're trained to do is "read the room."   You watch for body language to indicate the level of engagement and whether or not people agree or disagree and encourage them to participate.  I also watch for when the energy drops, etc.  

It also means that I can't stubbornly soldier on with a lesson plan if it is bombing.   One thing I learned many years ago, is that as an instructor you have to be in the moment, focus on your learners more than yourself, and don't be afraid to flush your lesson plan down the toilet if it isn't working.

What Twitter or other back channel does is that it leaves the guess work out it.

Olivia Mitchell 's guest post on Pistachio Consulting offers some good tips:

1. Ask a friend or colleague, or a volunteer from the audience to monitor the back channel and interrupt you if there are any questions or comments that need to be addressed. Jeffrey Veen calls this person an ombudsman for the audience.

2. If you can’t find someone to take on this role take breaks - say every 10 mins - to check Twitter. Robert Scoble calls this taking a twitter break. You can combine this with asking the audience for “out-loud” questions as well. It’s good practice to stop for questions throughout your presentation - rather than leaving questions till the end.

3. If you’re courageous and know your content backwards, display the back channel on a screen that everyone (including you) can see. This is potentially distracting for you and has the downside in that the visibility it provides can provoke silly tweets from some (eg: “Hi Mom”). But it does mean that you can react immediately to any issues. Spend some time at the beginning of your presentation explaining to your audience how you will respond to the twitter stream and audience members are more likely to use it responsibly.


While this advice is more appropriate for the classroom, Vicky Davis shares how she manages the back channel. 

I like to find two people to help: one to serve as Google Jockey (a/k/a Link dropper) and another to serve as a moderator -- posing questions to me when I take a breath and ask.


How do you incorporate the backchannel in your conference or panel presentations?

Update:  Olivia wrote a follow up post here and a post with engagement techniques.


Resource List

Early Use of Backchannels
Tara Hunt, Backchannel=Blogosphere
Marc Cantor, Spell My Name Correctly
Liz Lawley, Backchannel Modes
Liz Lawley, Confessions of a Backchannel Queen
Clay Shirky, Snarkiness on Parade
NY Times, In the Lecture Hall, A Geek Chorus
Dannah Boyd, Bridging Diverse Groups

Backchannel in Learning and Education

Vicky Davis, Backchannel in My Classroom
Vicky Davis, Backchannels and Micro Blogging Streams
Brian Kelly, Using Networked Technologies To Support Conferences
Participatory Media Literacy,  BackChannel
Nancy White, Hopping Between Notetaking and Backchannel Conversations
Nancy White, Online Facilitation Tips

Backchannel and Twitter
Olivia Mitchell, How To Present While People Are Twittering
Howard Greenstein, Project Management Helped By Microblogging
Marketing Vox, Trends in Leadership Conferences
Sacha Chua, Feel Free To Use Your Laptop or Phone - I love the backchannel

My NTC Schedule in New Orleans Next Week and My Giant Insect Goal


Photo by Markpolous AttributionNoncommercialNo Derivative Works

I am one week before the NTC, Day of Service, and Penguin Day and it's pretty crazy to say the least.  I wanted to get my schedule in one easy to reference place (for myself) and think about how to incorporate some new panel moderation/panel techniques into my practice.

One of the reflections to come out of this week SXSW Conference was for moderators of panels to use Twitter (or back channel tool) to poll the audience upfront and monitor it real time.  Nancy White made a great observation in the comments, "The new tools give us new ways to transmit the cues and sense where others are, even if we do not coordinate our actions. It’s like a new set of antennae."  So, if you're moderating a panel, think of yourself as a giant insect!

In some email back and forth with Nancy, she brought up the issue of agreements and expectations from the audience, moderator, and the panelists - that includes listening and sending signals.   How do we negotiate what we have the capacity to do?  I know for myself, it will be a challenge to add this new level of multi-tasking (watching a twitter stream in real time) while in the room - in addition reading the body language, traffic coping the conversation, listening to the panelists, keeping an eye on the watch, etc.

So where is the line and how do we declare what it is for each of us and negotiate (if and when) it means something to us as a group?  What are the expectations or acceptable behavior for sending signals from the audience?   When you are moderating a face-to-face discussion, part of the job is to keep in on track - on topic and on time - while allowing for interesting conversation to flow.  However, this means reining in off topic directions or disruptive group behavior.   Adding Twitter as a listening tool will really demand a new level of moderation skills.

I'm going to challenge myself to do this in a couple of sessions where we might have a lot of Twitter users and going to make some quick notes on practice.

Tuesday, March 18
Night Before Day of Service Dinner
Cheryl Hanback and I Co-Leaders
Sign up here

Wednesday, March 19
Day of Service

Breakfast at 8:00 am at the hotel
Wireless Network Installation team at Community Center of St. Bernard leaves 8:45
Strategy consults at hotel - 9-11
Wireless Network Installation team returns to hotel - noon
Training Team for Center of St. Bernard leaves hotel 12:30
Training Team works on site from 12-2
Jay Dedman Video Blogging Workshop -2-5

Netsquared Meet up 5:00 PM

Thursday, March 20
10:30-Noon
So you want to be a consultant?
-Use Twitter in beginning as part of poll of audience questions
-Use Twitter during small groups to cross pollinate
-Use Twitter at the full group report out

Social Media ROI Case Study Slam
1:30-3:00
Detailed Plan

I'm moderating the panel
-Use Twitter for audience poll
-Monitor Twitter during the 5 minute ignite style presentations and incorporate questions

3:30 PM
Need to figure out which session to tweet or micro blog

Friday, March 21

Building, Growing, Sustaining Vibrant Online Community
10:30-Noon
I'm a panelist

The Next Latest Thing
1:30-3:00 PM
I'm a panelist

3:30 PM
I'm leaning towards Jay Dedman's video blogging to get my video blogging mojo back

Saturday, March 22
Penguin Day

Marc Canter: Spell My Name Correctly!

70934025_08faf50089

How Marc Canter deals with the backchannel:  Just spell my name correctly!

I can relate.  My name is constantly mispelled. And here is a little context about why the Canter/Cantor/Kanter/Kantor name.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Intermediated Conferences and Backchannels

I'm thinking a lot about "backchannels" in a very micro way ... (e.g. chat going on while a phone discussion).  This is part of my  preparation for a 90-minute webinar I'm doing for N-TEN on making face-to-face workshop/panel sessions more interactive.   

I'm using web/phone conference software called "Ready/Talk" which (thank god) offers some interactive features, like chat and handing control of presentation to someone else's desktop.   Since the workshop is essentiallly about designing more interactive face-to-face learning environments, I don't want to model a 85 minute lecture with 100 slide powerpoint, leaving 5 minutes for q&A at end.   

I'm thinking of ways to integrate the chat with the phone discussion -- similar to what I experienced and learned about during Nancy White's Online Facilitation Workshop last fall.

But the word backchannel also refers to the chat in a conference where there are people in the room chatting as well as remote participation.  I wonder if there are learnings or ideas one can take from here?
So, this has brought me to the question of the learning design of the backchannel - if there is such a thing.

One of my favorite vloggers and screencasters is Raymond M. Kristiansen who is a self-proclaimed Norwegian media juggler.  He recently participated in the backchannel for Les Blogs.  He shows a video clip of Mena Trott's Keynote calling for more civility in blog commenting.  Apparently, the comments in the backchannel got her angry, they weren't so civil - particularly those from Ben MetCalfe who Mena called to the mike.  (Warning she says the F-word on the clip.)  See Dave Winer's comments here, or as someone on the vlog list "Fighting for civilty using rudeness."

Raymond goes on to raise some really good reflective questions about backchannel:

How do they affect the relationship between those on the stage and the audience?
What does this intermediation of dialogues mean?
How can we use back-channels as a progressive force at conferences?
How can we use them as a test of how things are going at the conference?
How can we play further with the distance between those up there - on the podium and those in the audience?

Some more things to read on backchannel
Backchannel = Blogosphere
Liz Lawley on Backchannels and here

Update: September, 2007

Coolcat Teacher wrote an excellent post reflecting on the use of backchannels in the classroom

Technorati Tags: , , , Technorati Tags: